Symfony 5 Seguridad: Autenticadores

Hey Sasa,

Thank you for your interest in SymfonyCasts tutorials!

Yeah, that's a good idea! And probably this course will fit this topic well. I'll add this to our topics list about Security in order to cover it in this tutorial, tough I'm not 100% sure if it will be included or no, but we will try our best.

Thanks for this idea! And if you could tell us a bit more what exactly is complex for you in this topic, or where exactly you're stuck, or what isn't covered by the official docs - that would be awesome and helps us to consider if it should be included in this tutorial or maybe deserves its own mini tutorial.

Cheers!

Hi Victor,

Thank you for interesting,

I create my security by watching videos from Symfony cast. And now I have problem to implement server side receptcha. There is some bundles but they use symfony forms for rendering login form, and they use Recaptcha3Type as a custom form type field, but I have basic HTML form, and I am confused. Also I founded bundle https://github.com/google/r..., but I don't know where and how to implement server side code.

Also maybe You can consider to cover integration with Oauth2, I find some instruction for implementing: https://dev.to/_mertsimsek/... - but it is much better when You explains it 😊.

Dont get me wrong, I understand that the goal is to present the possibilities of a security bundle, but for someone who does not have a lot of experience, or just want to make something quick and small in Symfony, everything get litle complicated and it takes too much time.

I think that there should be some simple, fast and reusable solution that will cover everything that is needed for authentication (Registration with email validation, reset pass, Log in, Oauth2, receptcha....)

Also I must say that I am very happy that I am accidentally found reset-password-bundle, and verify-email-bundle, and I think that's the right way to simplify and speed things up for Authentication

Best regard

Hey Sasa!

Thank you for providing more info from your side! It's really helpful when things come to planning a new course :) I won't promise everything your mentioned will be covered in this course, but I'll do my best to deliver this to the course authors, and probably they will fit some topics into it.

Also, good catch on those reset-password-bundle and verify-email-bundle :) Yeah, we would also like to cover them in our future screencasts, those bundles kinda new, and it would help to reveal them to more devs this way.

About oauth, you could also check another our bundle: https://github.com/knpunive... that helps with integration - it also has docs with examples how to configure it in your project.

I hope this helps!

Cheers!

Hey It O.!

This is the *next* tutorial - so it's right after Turbo. My guess would be about 3 weeks - it won't be significantly delayed because it's definitely happening after Turbo (I'm mostly not sure because I don't know yet exactly how long Turbo will go).

So, soon! Cjeers!

Awesome, can't wait to transform the current security system.

Thank's Ryan 👍

Hey Bender,

Except the main firewall, do you have this dev one in your config/packages/security.yaml file?

security:
   firewalls:
        dev:
            pattern: ^/(_(profiler|wdt)|css|images|js)/
            security: false
        main:
            # ...

And it should be above your main firewall. Does it help? It should allow loading your assets and WDT even for not logged in requests.

But I suppose when you logged in - you should be able to open those assets, no? Otherwise, please double check that links to the assets are correct, probably files are not available by the links you're using.

I hope this helps!

Cheers!

Hi Victor,

I do have the same dev one, looks like the problem is caused by the new MoodleSession cookie when redirect back to http://moodle.test/foo/parent in line 5 (or 5th request when accessing moodle.test/foo/parent). If all works correctly, all following requests should use the one (42mptspeutr70ag0hecdjr53kt) set by the POST request (the 3rd request). It might have something to do with how Moodle decides to set or destroy this MoodleSession cookie. Thanks anyway!

Hey Bender,

it might be so, yeah. Glad you figured out the problem :)

Cheers!

Hi Victor,

Sorry to bother again. I still haven't figure out why a redirect to moodle.test/qsishenzhen/parent will get a response header with Set-Cookie, hope you can point me to a direction that's closer to get a solution.

I've updated framework.yaml (according to the Session documentation) in hope that Symfony wouldn't overwrite $_SESSION once it's set by config.php from Moodle:

framework:
    session:
        storage_factory_id: session.storage.factory.php_bridge
        handler_id: ~
        cookie_secure: auto
        cookie_samesite: lax

Here is my updated MoodleAuthenticator code:

<?php

namespace App\Security;

// 'config.php' sets up $_SESSION
require_once(__DIR__ . '/../../../config.php');
// require_login();

...

class MoodleAuthenticator extends AbstractAuthenticator
{
    public function supports(Request $request): ?bool
    {
        return $request->getPathInfo() === '/parent';
    }

    public function authenticate(Request $request): Passport
    {
        if (!isset($_SESSION['USER']) || $_SESSION['USER']->id === 0) {
            // dd('in authenticate(), $_SESSION[\'USER\'] not corect', $_SESSION);
            // This Moodle function checks that the current user is logged in and has the required privileges
            require_login();
        }

        $username = $_SESSION['USER']->username;
        // dd('in authenticate(), $_SESSION[\'USER\'] correct', $_SESSION);

        return new SelfValidatingPassport(new UserBadge($username));
    }

    public function onAuthenticationSuccess(Request $request, TokenInterface $token, string $firewallName): ?Response
    {
        // dd('in onAuthenticationSuccess()', $_SESSION);
        return null;
    }

...
}

And ParentController:

namespace App\Controller;

...

class ParentController extends AbstractController
{
    public function __construct(
        private RequestStack $requestStack,
    ) {
    }

    #[Route('/parent', name: 'app_parent')]
    public function index(): Response
    {
        $this->denyAccessUnlessGranted('IS_AUTHENTICATED');
        $moodleSession = $this->requestStack->getCurrentRequest()->cookies->get('MoodleSession');
        return $this->render('parent/index.html.twig', [
            'controller_name' => 'ParentController',
            'session' => $_SESSION,
            'moodleSession' => $moodleSession,
        ]);
    }
}

In a newly opened private tab, accessing moodle.test/qsishenzhen/parent will redirect me to the Moodle login page:

After submit username and password:

The page (moodle.test/qsishenzhen/parent) loads fine, with all the assets files loaded and WDT shows the authenticated user. But a refresh will redirect me to the Moodle login page, probably because of the new value for MoodleSesion cookie.

Access to moodle.test/qsishenzhen/admin is all okay except no authenticated user, refresh won't redirect.

My understanding of Symfony authenticator is that every request will go through authenticator first, so whether or not supports() returns true, the scripts in config.php will got executed. But why a redirect to moodle.test/qsishenzhen/parent would get a Set-Cookie header while a redirect to moodle.test/qsishenzhen/admin wouldn't (not with current code, but when I put require_login() right below require_once('config.php'))?

Again, any help is much appreciated!

Hey Bender,

Unfortunately, we don't have the bandwidth to help our users with their custom projects. I can try to give you some tips, probably they will help. But probably you will need to do more debugging work on it. First of all, I would recommend you to use symfony serve command to run your website locally on the default 127.0.0.1:8000 address. Because in case you use a real web server like Nginx/Apache - probably you need some config tweaks to make it work correctly, I'm not sure. Ideally follow the way that is shown in the course, i.e. use Symfony built-in web server.

In the support() method of your custom authenticator you may want to check for the specific route name instead of the path, e.g. you can get the route name from $request->attributes->get('_route') and check if it matches your login route name to decide if your authenticator supports this request or no. Also, if you use this authenticator for traditional login form - you can also check that the request is the POST request with $request->isMethod('POST');, something like this:

return 'security_login' === $request->attributes->get('_route')
        && $request->isMethod('POST');

Also, make sure you have installed HTTPS certificates to make HTTPS work locally for you. See symfony server:ca:install command for this in case you haven't installed it. Or try to uninstall it and install again.

Also, you can play with different config values for

    cookie_secure:        auto # One of true; false; "auto"
    cookie_httponly:      true
    cookie_samesite:      lax # One of null; "lax"; "strict"; "none"

You may also want to enable redirects intercepting to see from what page you're redirecting, see: https://symfony.com/doc/current/reference/configuration/web_profiler.html#intercept-redirects - sometimes it might be helpful to understand the problem with redirecting.

I hope that helps and thank you for understanding!

Cheers!

Hey Kasal,

You can turn off the CSRF validation if that causes issues in your case or if you just don't need that.

Cheers!

Hello Victor,

Thanks for your response!

I have resolved it and added the solution in the link.

Cheers!

Hey Kasal,

Great, glad to hear you nailed it!

Cheers!

Hey @Ash-M!

I have wondered about covering some basic testing throughout the series... just to help enable people who are interested. I might still do that for the Symfony 7 tutorials...

For authenticators specifically, these are such an "integration" layer: they are almost configuration that is tying many different parts of the system together. So yes, I generally use functional / e2e testing for these. And part of the reason that works is that the logic inside the authenticators is quite simple: there is one general code path and any real logic is isolated to other services (for example, query logic is isolated to the repository, which you could choose to test). I don't see value in a unit test: it feels meaningless to, for example, assert that the authenticate method returns a Passport with certain badges. If the logic in authenticate() were super complex... and I needed to check of some specific badge is returned in some scenario... MAYBE I would unit test it then. But I would first try to isolate that logic into a different service so I could unit test that.

Anyway, these are just personal opinions: a lot of thought and philosophy can go into testing, and I don't really think about it too deeply, tbh. But I hope hearing my thoughts (for what they're worth) is helpful :).

Cheers!

Hey @weaverryan,

Thanks for the prompt reply. It is very helpful to have any input on the topic, so thank you!

The tutorials are well written and more digestible than the official docs by offering a sample application to follow. It makes the information more organized, like once you get to a certain point, some of these feature become relevant. You don't get that guidance from the docs. However, both describe how to use a component and testing is never really addressed other than in isolated segments for how to test your application code.

To that end, do you have any ideas on what your integration tests might look like or opinions on the samples I described in my comment? What did you think about TDD and the through process of:

• What does this component do?
  Authenticates a user
• How does it do that?
  It returns a passport with a badge if authenticated.
• Okay, write a scenario where a request with the (correct/incorrect) credentials (yields/doesn't yield) a passport

Or does that sound like a goal accomplished by an E2E test? Any example is fine since once you paint a path for this we can really apply it to any of the tuts.

Thanks again!

Hey @Ash-M!

The tutorials are well written and more digestible than the official docs by offering a sample application to follow

Thank you! That's the goal - and we can get to be more opinionated here, which helps :)

To that end, do you have any ideas on what your integration tests might look like or opinions on the samples I described in my comment?

Sure! You mentioned:

From a BDD perspective, a test like this doesn't really offer insight into any particular goal. You can say the goal is to "login", but there are 2 problems with that:

You might have a point, but actually, we do write tests specifically about logging in. On the Feature description, we use something like:

Feature: Login
  In order to smoothly use the site
  As a non-logged in visitor,
  I need to login and continue to the correct page

And then we have scenarios that specifically just logging in and its different cases. That allows us in scenarios for others features to just say:

  Background:
    Given I am authenticated

What did you think about TDD and the through process of:

If I understand correctly, you're talking about testing the authenticator class directly (via a unit test or perhaps an integration test if that makes more sense). I think doing that is fine, but I probably wouldn't. I would definitely have an E2E test (like described above with the "Login" feature). Most of the time, your authenticator will not be too complex, so testing the 1, 2 or 3 different "flows" in an E2E test is what I'd do. If your authenticator is more complex than that - with various different badges based on some complex logic, then I'd test it. But generally, the logic in authenticators is small enough that it doesn't "scare me" - which is my personal check for if I should unit test something. But of course logging in is super important, hence the E2E to make sure it's all working.

Cheers!

Thanks Ryan for taking the time to reply, and thanks for your opinionated insight! I think opinionated advice is great so long as people understand that it's opinionated and there are many ways to skin cats. It offers a much needed premise when teaching advanced things quickly.

Thanks again.

Hey @Sebastian-O!

Yup, this still works great with 6.4/7 and shows the best way to do things. It was recorded with Symfony 5.3, but there have not been major changes since then (a credit to the new security system!). We will upgrade this for Symfony 7, but it's still good to go. But if you have any issues or spot anything that looks weird or different, you can ask about it in the comments :)

Cheers!

Hey @Johann!

Sorry for the slow reply! Yes, it should work just fine, hmm.

but files that were generated are quite different to the files here in this tutorial or github or in the symfony documentation

This is something we will need to check into - I totally see what you're referring to though!

i can't find where the verify URL is generated and no email is send.

When I followed the docs just now, I end up with some code that looks like this:

A) RegistrationController::register() - inside the if ($form->isSubmitted() && $form->isValid()) {, I have:

$this->emailVerifier->sendEmailConfirmation('app_verify_email', $user,
    (new TemplatedEmail())
        ->from(new Address('mailer@example.com', 'AcmeMailBot'))
        ->to($user->getEmail())
        ->subject('Please Confirm your Email')
        ->htmlTemplate('registration/confirmation_email.html.twig')
);

B) In src/Security/EmailVerifier.php, we generate a new helper class to actually send the confirmation email. Its sendEmailConfirmation() contains the code that creates the signedUrl and other variables for confirmation + actually sends the email with $this->mailer->send().

Do you see similar code? Does this help point in the right direction? Emails are always tricky because it's possible everything works... but then a misconfiguration in the email system causes the email to not actually be delivered. However, you can always go to /_profiler and find the POST request to /register and click to see the profiler for that page. There, should be able to click the Emails tab on the left. If an email was sent during the successful registration form submit, you should see it here.

Let me know if that helps!

Cheers!

Hi Ryan,
thanks for the hints. Everything was my bad :-(
for whatever reason i have no debug-toolbar on the 'lost pw request-page'. (i have to investigate this). so i couldn't see the qeued emails because of the forgotten (i forgot) 'Symfony\Component\Mailer\Messenger\SendEmailMessage: async' config. i commented it out, and everything works fine!
thank you

Woo! I'm just happy it worked! And anyway, this poked me to update the verify bundle docs :)

Cheers!

Hey Grenouille,

We're using MySQL server in this course but looks like you have MariaDB installed. Though MySQL and MariaDB almost identical, they may have some differences, and looks like one of it you revealed with that error I'd recommend you to use MySQL instead if you have it installed, otherwise, since it's a learning project and does not contain any important data - you can skip migrations and just run:

$ bin/console doctrine:schema:update --force

It will sync the DB schema with your mapping configuration. You may lose some important data in the DB this way, but if those data are dummy data and you don't care about it - that's totally OK. And you can always reload fixtures again if needed.

I hope this helps!

P.S. But if you you'r working on a real project and will try to deploy changes to production - it seems like you need to regenerate migrations for your specific DB version.

Cheers!

Hey Lex,

Yeah, it's super closed to be released in full already :) Yeah, we do have such a page! Take a look at this link: https://symfonycasts.com/co... - this will list upcoming tutorials, but nothing much there yet except the EastAdmin that you're right should be next, and it should happen very soon already ;)

Thank you for your patience!

Cheers!

What about Cache? I can't see any course about Symfony Cache.

Hey @Solvex

You're right we do not have a dedicated course on cache, but it's because it's just a small thing that we explain in other tutorials. I'll leave you here a chapter that you can watch about caching stuff
https://symfonycasts.com/sc...

Cheers!

I don't think cache is simple. Contracts, PSR-6, Marshalling, CachePoolItem, TagAware... In fact, it is very difficult to use, especially the tagged cache. Perhaps a small course of 5-10 lessons will fill in the gaps when using the cache.

That's a pretty good idea... :)

Hey Solvex,

Sure! SymfonyCasts doesn't have any courses that were not finished after they had started releasing ;) It will be continued after Christmas / New Year holidays, sorry for any inconvenience and thanks for your patience!

Cheers!

Thanks!
We have been looking forward to this course for so long!
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!

Hey Solvex,

Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to you too! :) Sorry for holiday delays!

Cheers!

Спасибо!
Очень эти праздники не вовремя.

Hey @Andris!

Thank you for the nice words :)

> Could you please add logout after timeout (logout unactive user) capability to this tutorial?

That simplest way to implement this is with a session timeout: https://symfony.com/doc/cur...

However, another approach would be to set a "lastActiveTime" property on your User object. I would do that by adding a listener to the RequestEvent (previously called kernel.request): it runs at the start of every request. In there, I would check the logged-in-user's "lastActiveTime" against the current time. If it is too long, then invalidate the session. If it is NOT too long, then update lastActiveTime to the current time.

If you have any questions on this, let me know :). I probably won't talk about it in the tutorial, but I'd be happy to answer questions here.

Cheers!

weaverryan
Thank you for reply!
I will do it like you suggest.
Thanks for the solution.

Hey Gustavo D.

There is not an oficial release date yet but this course should happen after "Doctrine Relations" (https://symfonycasts.com/sc... so, it should not take too long :)

Cheers!

Hey azeem!

That's not something we're going to cover, unfortunately. PSR-15 is built on top of PSR-7, which was designed (unfortunately) to be incompatible with Symfony's request/response objects (to be more fair, Symfony could, with some work, change their classes to implement PSR-7, but they don't want to implement it because they/we don't like the dev experience of PSR-7). And so, PSR-15 is awkward to work with in Symfony. There is a bridge that allows it to work - https://symfony.com/doc/cur... - but it's not a main use-case in the Symfony world :).

Cheers!