Validation
Keep on Learning!
If you liked what you've learned so far, dive in! Subscribe to get access to this tutorial plus video, code and script downloads.
With a Subscription, click any sentence in the script to jump to that part of the video!
Login SubscribeThere are a bunch of different ways for the users of our API to mess things up, like bad JSON or doing silly things like passing a negative number for the value
field. This is dragon gold, not dragon debt!
Invalid JSON
This chapter is all about handling these bad things in a graceful way. Try the POST endpoint. Let's send some invalid JSON. Hit Execute. Awesome! A 400
error! That's what we want. 400 - or any status code that starts with 4 - means that the client - the user of the API - made a mistake. 400 specifically means "bad request".
In the response, the type is hydra:error
and it says: An error occurred
and Syntax Error
. Oh, and this trace
only shows in the debug environment: it won't be shown on production.
So this is pretty sweet! Invalid JSON is handled out-of-the-box.
Business Rules Validation Constraints
Let's try something different, like sending empty JSON. This gives us the dreaded 500 error. Boo. Internally, API platform creates a DragonTreasure
object... but doesn't set any data on it. And then it explodes when it hits the database because some of the columns are null
.
And, we expected this! We're missing validation. Adding validation to our API is exactly like adding validation anywhere in Symfony. For example, find the name
property. We need name
to be required. So, add the NotBlank
constraint, and hit tab. Oh, but I'm going to go find the NotBlank
use
statement... and change this to Assert
. That's optional... but it's the way the cool kids tend do it in Symfony. Now say Assert\NotBlank
:
// ... lines 1 - 19 | |
use Symfony\Component\Validator\Constraints as Assert; | |
// ... lines 21 - 51 | |
class DragonTreasure | |
{ | |
// ... lines 54 - 61 | |
// ... line 63 | |
private ?string $name = null; | |
// ... lines 65 - 188 | |
} |
Below, add one more: Length
. Let's say that the name should be at least two characters, max
50 characters... and add a maxMessage
: Describe your loot in 50 chars or less
:
// ... lines 1 - 19 | |
use Symfony\Component\Validator\Constraints as Assert; | |
// ... lines 21 - 51 | |
class DragonTreasure | |
{ | |
// ... lines 54 - 61 | |
min: 2, max: 50, maxMessage: 'Describe your loot in 50 chars or less') | (|
private ?string $name = null; | |
// ... lines 65 - 188 | |
} |
How Errors Look in the Response
Good start! Let's try it again. Take that same empty JSON, hit Execute, and yes! A 422 response! This is a really common response code that usually means there was a validation error. And behold! The @type
is ConstraintViolationList
. This is a special JSON-LD type added by API Platform. Earlier, we saw this documented in the JSON-LD
documentation.
Watch: go to /api/docs.jsonld
and search for a ConstraintViolation
. There it is! API Platform adds two classes - ConstraintViolation
and ConstraintViolationList
to describe how validation errors will look. A ConstraintViolationList
is basically just a collection of ConstraintViolations
... and then it describes what the ConstraintViolation
properties are.
We can see these over here: we have a violations
property with propertyPath
and then the message
below.
Adding More Constraints
Ok! Let's sneak in a few more constraints. Add NotBlank
above description
... and GreaterThanOrEqual
to 0
above value
to avoid negatives. Finally, for coolFactor
use GreaterThanOrEqual
to 0 and also LessThanOrEqual
to 10. So something between 0 and 10:
// ... lines 1 - 51 | |
class DragonTreasure | |
{ | |
// ... lines 54 - 68 | |
private ?string $description = null; | |
// ... lines 71 - 77 | |
0) | (|
private ?int $value = null; | |
// ... lines 80 - 82 | |
0) | (|
10) | (|
private ?int $coolFactor = null; | |
// ... lines 86 - 192 | |
} |
And while we're here, we don't need to do this, but I'm going to initialize $value
to 0 and $coolFactor
to 0. This makes both of those not required in the API: if the user doesn't send them, they'll default to 0:
// ... lines 1 - 51 | |
class DragonTreasure | |
{ | |
// ... lines 54 - 68 | |
private ?string $description = null; | |
// ... lines 71 - 77 | |
0) | (|
private ?int $value = 0; | |
// ... lines 80 - 82 | |
0) | (|
10) | (|
private ?int $coolFactor = 0; | |
// ... lines 86 - 192 | |
} |
Ok, go back and try that same endpoint. Look at that beautiful validation! Also try setting coolFactor
to 11
. Yup! No treasure is that cool... well, unless it's a giant plate of nachos.
Passing Bad Types
Ok, there's one last way that a user can send bad stuff: by passing the wrong type. So coolFactor: 11
will fail our validation rules. But what if we pass a string
instead? Yikes! Hit Execute. Okay: a 400
status code, that's good. Though, it's not a validation error, it has a different type. But it does tell the user what happened:
the type of the
coolFactor
attribute must beint
,string
given.
Good enough! This is thanks to the setCoolFactor()
method. The system sees the int
type and so it rejects the string with this error.
So the only thing that we need to worry about in our app is writing good code that properly uses type
and adding validation constraints: the safety net that catches business rule violations... like value
should be greater than 0 or description
is required. API Platform handles the rest.
Next: our API only has one resource: DragonTreasure
. Let's add a second resource - a User
resource - so that we can link which user owns which treasure in the API.
hi, regarding coolFactor, is there any way we can validate that the type must be numeric so the response will have status 422 with the error message instead of 400?
I tried the Type validation with numeric type but it doesn't work